|
Post by The Rolling Rooster on Oct 24, 2004 20:11:37 GMT -5
Yes... you're right... jeeperz... I don't even think all of these things through... so many options.... AHH brain over load. LOL
|
|
|
Post by The Capricious Capodecina on Oct 24, 2004 20:13:22 GMT -5
No Worries, luv
|
|
|
Post by The Rolling Rooster on Oct 24, 2004 21:01:48 GMT -5
Would you rather die of a broken heart ....... or...... heart attack?
|
|
|
Post by The Poetic Protégée on Oct 25, 2004 4:40:45 GMT -5
Hmm...well, that depends. Neither of them sound overwhelmingly appealing. I would say a broken heart though because I am a hopeless romantic... And as for the previous question I don't know whether I could choose between them...everyone dies of shortness of breath ultimately I think I'd choose drowning if I had to make a decision...hopefully what they say is right and drowning is not really so bad after all.
|
|
|
Post by The Rolling Rooster on Oct 26, 2004 12:06:50 GMT -5
Yes.... in that reguard I would pick broken heart as well... but in a way that would be much more painful... so I might choose heart attack... which is rather quick and you're gone...
|
|
|
Post by The Poetic Protégée on Oct 26, 2004 12:09:47 GMT -5
Mmm....yeah. It's such a difficult decision..you're so good at picking them! ;D
|
|
|
Post by The Rolling Rooster on Oct 26, 2004 13:03:32 GMT -5
LOL.... thanks Lynx. Now we are in need of a new question. Would you rather be killed by a complete stranger... or someone you knew?
|
|
|
Post by The Poetic Protégée on Oct 26, 2004 16:49:38 GMT -5
Again...tricky. I think it would have to be a complete stranger because then you could believe that you could have done nothing to prevent it...if you knew the person then there might have been something you could have done to prevent yourself getting killed. (if you see what I mean ) Most murders are committed by people the victim knew...scary
|
|
|
Post by The Rolling Rooster on Oct 26, 2004 17:02:56 GMT -5
Yeah... I agree.. if you didn't know the person, that would make it a wee bit better.... but I mean... once you're dead it doesn't really matter all that much as to who killed you...
I was just curious.
|
|
|
Post by CIA Agente Arenas on Oct 28, 2004 16:52:20 GMT -5
As long as I didn't know who it was... I don't think I'd (be in a position to) mind. If I had to pick and choose, I'd go with the stranger. It wouldn't be quite so... personal.
|
|
|
Post by The Rolling Rooster on Oct 28, 2004 18:11:16 GMT -5
Hmm.... let's see if I can't get these icons in this some how... rather be whipped to death... or........ squished?
|
|
|
Post by CIA Agente Arenas on Nov 2, 2004 18:18:15 GMT -5
Gosh, I've been whipped so many times for being late with Survivor that I'm not sure it'd be effective anymore. In seriousness though... I think I'd go with whipping. Either way, there is agonizing pain. If you get squished but don't die (like those bugs you squish...) you are going to be in a world of pain that nobody would really be sure you were in if they were inclined to assume that you're dead. At least if you're whipped... they'd be sure to check periodically if you were out of your misery.
|
|
|
Post by The Poetic Protégée on Nov 2, 2004 18:49:21 GMT -5
I think I'd go for being squished...whipping just does not sound like something I'd want to be on the recieving end of
|
|
|
Post by The Rolling Rooster on Nov 2, 2004 19:21:47 GMT -5
Oh boy... I wouldn't choose whipping... cause that's awful... I wouldn't do that to anyone... but I have been known to squish the occasional bug... so I guess right is right and fair is fair....
|
|
|
Post by The Poetic Protégée on Nov 8, 2004 9:23:31 GMT -5
oh Roo, you make me giggle ;D
|
|